RBC’S
WHIZ-KID STEPS UP TO THE PLATE,
FINALLY...
(CONTINUED) |
Contents:
|
1
| 2
| 3
| |
But this should not
be confused with a true financial
emergency. “This is nothing
compared with Dome Petroleum, or LDC
[lesser-developed country—a
huge crisis for banks in the early
1980s] debt, or even the real estate
collapse of the early 1990s,”
Healy says. “The Royal has been
on top for a long time, but there’s
no winning strategy that works all
the time. It’s Royal’s
turn to take its lumps, but these
lumps are more psychic than real.”
After years of observation, Healy
concludes that roughing up an otherwise
healthy bank stock is what stockbrokers
do when they lack better sport. In
fact, every bank except Bank of Nova
Scotia has been the target of similar
treatment in recent years. Toronto-Dominion
got whacked over technology lending,
CIBC because of its involvement in
the Enron and Global Crossing scandals,
Bank of Montreal simply for being
Bank of Montreal—“and
they’ve all come roaring back,”
Healy says. “Royal will, too.”
Money manager Ira
Gluskin goes even further. RBC’s
golden towers may have temporarily
lost their lustre, but “the
earnings are terrific, the stock is
trading near an all-time high, and
we’re acting like the Royal
Bank is Stelco,” he says. “These
are such mild problems in the world
of business it’s a joke.”
Why the great sense of drama? “People
follow the Royal Bank like they follow
the Red Sox and the Yankees,”
Gluskin says. “Everybody has
an opinion about the World Series.
And everybody has an opinion about
what Gord Nixon’s doing at Royal
Bank.”
The worst thing that
Nixon’s critics say about him
is that they were shocked when he
was named CEO, and that, for a go-to
guy renowned for his athletic talents
and leadership abilities, he’s
taken an extraordinarily long time
to pick up and run with the ball.
NIXON
SAYS HE TOOK HIS TIME BECAUSE
HE WANTS TO GET IT RIGHT. 'YOU
CAN MOVE QUICKLY AND MAKE THE
WRONG DECISIONS,
OR YOU CAN EXERCISE PATIENCE AND
MAKE
THE RIGHT ONES.' |
In particular, financial
services analysts complain that while
the domestic businesses all continue
to perform well, Nixon’s RBC
has neglected the U.S. assets. “Centura
is a bit of a flashpoint,” says
CIBC’s Broad, “but I think
you can look at the entire U.S. platform.”
The bank spent $8.4 billion to buy,
capitalize and merge U.S. assets;
at the height of their profitability
in 2003, Broad says, those operations
contributed $371 million. This year
that number looks likely to drop by
half. “You don’t need
to be a financial specialist, you
just do the math.”
Nixon rejects that
assessment. “I wish we had moved
sooner with respect to the U.S.,”
he says. Yet he says that in his view,
the problems stem from how RBC operates
as an organization—and the solution
lies, not in some quick fix in North
Carolina, but in changing RBC’s
approach to every penny in what, as
of July 31, was a $450-billion financial
empire operating in more than 30 countries.
 |
To understand what
he’s doing, Nixon says, you
have to start back in 2001. When he
took over as CEO, “we had just
made some fairly significant acquisitions,
including the U.S. mortgage business,
Centura, Liberty Insurance and Dain
Rauscher,” the last being the
Minneapolis-based full-service investment
brokerage that RBC purchased in 2000,
and that includes Tucker Anthony Sutro
of Boston, which RBC Dain Rauscher
absorbed six months later. Today,
they tend to be lumped together—“the
U.S. operations”—as if
they’re a stand-alone entity.
But that, Nixon explains, was never
the case: under Cleghorn, the Royal
Bank operated as five separate business
divisions—personal and commercial
banking; wealth management; capital
markets; insurance; and global services—each
with its own U.S. expansion strategy.
Recalls Chuck Winograd, vice-chairman,
RBC Capital Markets: “We each
bought different businesses, sometimes
in very different locations.”
Cleghorn, notoriously cautious when
it came to acquisitions, challenged
each division to seek out and scoop
up the best U.S. operations he thought
they could afford. Cleghorn’s
target: a 15 percent return on each
of these investments within three
years of purchase; what’s more,
they were supposed to account for
25 percent of RBC’s total annual
profit by 2002.
When Cleghorn handed
the bank over to Nixon in August 2001,
the prevailing view, both internal
and external, was that the U.S. acquisition
program was safely on track. Nixon
figured that his biggest task would
be getting all these different fiefdoms
to start working together—getting
one’s children to share toys
is a snap compared with asking bankers
to share customers—while at
the same time eliminating what he,
as an energetic young investment banker,
had always personally found the biggest
impediment to business: bureaucracy.
RBC is riddled with
what managers call “the functions,”
a term used to describe everything
from treasury and legal to IT and
ombudsperson services. Not only did
head office have senior executives
in charge of each function, but also
the five operating divisions had their
own personnel performing many of these
tasks. Getting everybody to understand
and approve anything innovative required
dozens of phone calls and weeks of
meetings. “The duplication drove
Gord crazy,” says Winograd.
Nixon is a born deal-maker,
his colleagues say, but that’s
not why he’s CEO. Rather, he
rose through the ranks because of
his genuine interest in organizational
issues. He’s the person who
managed to get RBC’s most fractious
and internally competitive departments—the
Royal Bank’s corporate lenders
and Dominion Securities’ investment
bankers—to put down their weapons
and start working together. In the
mid-1990s, both were losing ground
to the New York investment banks setting
up shop in Toronto. People familiar
with the inner workings of the Royal
say that in terms of difficulty, Nixon’s
assignment ranked right up there with
Cleghorn’s attempt to push through
a merger with BMO without giving advance
warning to then-Finance Minister Paul
Martin.
The difference was
that unlike Cleghorn, Nixon succeeded,
emerging from the two-year process
with a single operating unit that
could design and sell integrated debt-equity
financing packages—and with
next to no loss of major clients and
little loss of talent. How Nixon managed
to pull this off was “a question
of personality,” Fell says.
“Gord’s a leader. People
like working with him. He’s
good and he’s bright but there’s
not an arrogant bone in his body.”
Having worked this
miracle, Nixon now wants to do it
again, except on a considerably larger
scale. His vision is not so much of
the mythical financial supermarket
but of a financial department store
offering everything from self-serve
discount, to over-the-counter products
and advice, to haute couture. Royal
Bank employees should be able, if
desired, to come up with innovative
packages containing all three, or
anything else the bank has to offer.
|